Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts. What is your opinion?
Every society in general, and every nation in particular has a definite sense of sporting and cultural preferences, and the members of such society or country propagate these tilts through their active interest in the connected events.
First of all, it is true that the governments spend enormous amounts of money on these events. Interestingly, this spending is justified because these events not only entertain people they also generate huge income. However, if a country is least interested in organization of a global sporting event, it can significantly diminish its image before the world.
For example, such events is the Oktoberfest celebrated in Munich city of Bavarian Germany. It is a sixteen to eighteen days long affair, and attracts participants in excess of five million from across the globe. Thus, Oktoberfest has boosted the tourism industry of Germany beyond limits. Furthermore, sporting and cultural events encourage healthy competition between the members of a society. As a result, aid in preventing the various social evils that may otherwise gnaw at the roots of the civilization.
On the other hand, there is some truth in the argument that governments should support schools so that children can polish their sports and arts skills from an early age. However, the argument that governments should withdraw their support for professional sporting and cultural events and instead support only schools is hard to justify.
To conclude, it can safely be deduced that spending considerable sums of money on sports and cultural events is a popular trend of the modern and healthier society. It not only nourishes healthy thinking, but also promotes the soft image of the society worldwide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive interest in the connected events. First of all, it is true that the govern...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in general, in particular, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34558823529 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81459216686 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3057342204 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296179815787 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910015368023 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106294319687 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147267770701 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125001379775 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.