Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts. What is your opinion
There is no doubt that, there should be the channelized use of government funding towards the holistic development of nation. Some people believe that government funding should be transformed from professional sporting events to schools where students can opt from sports and arts. This essay will discuss positive and negative effect of notion of belief and followed by opinion.
Firstly, The government funding to the professional sporting events will up-lift the particular game, and also open the door for teenagers to opt for particular sports as career path. Secondly, such funding can be awarded as price money among the team players or player in single player game. This phenomenon will encourage the players to perform well and represent their country in global sporting event, and make countryman a proud moment. For an instance, Brazilian government spend lots of money to promote the football game and as result Brazilian football team is one of the best football team in the world.
However, some people think that such investment in professional sporting and cultural event is a wast. Foremost reason for it is, professional events are earning huge amount from advertising and sponsorship. So, they do not require government funding. Moreover, if the government funding is provided to schools for creating better environment sports and arts with latest equipment and auditorium will attract more students towards this are of career. Furthermore, training teenagers at this level will make them confident for the future and a nation has best players in their teams. For an instance, the China is providing best training to their students and as result they are at helm of list of winning medals in Olympics.
To conclude, it is the authorities' responsibility to proper channelize their fund so that the professional events and school level events both are promoted equally and eventually beneficial for nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, such funding can be awarded as price money among the team players or player i...
^^
Line 6, column 360, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ting better environment sports and arts with latest equipment and auditorium will attract m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 551, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the best'.
Suggestion: has the best
...m confident for the future and a nation has best players in their teams. For an instance...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
... in Olympics. To conclude, it is the authorities responsibility to proper channelize the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33006535948 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76969412016 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535947712418 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4742418942 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267429044684 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101997635311 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122486436082 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176427671212 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941589039858 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.