It is undeniable that within the last ten years, big improvements have been made in the IT world. Since the first iPhone, the birth of Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and other social networks or texting apps, a new form of social interaction has risen up. But I believe that this kind of social interaction does not decrease the interaction between people in some ways due to the following reasons.
First of all, technology, especially internet, has made e-conversations that could happen at anytime and anywhere. We always could see some Indian students were doing face-time with their families on the way to the school because the early in the morning is the right time to talk out of the time difference between Canada and India. That kind of connection not only saves their spare time, but also promotes closely connection between international students and their parents because the real-time sharing information such as what they see and what they hear at the moment has actually enhanced the family bonds and social connections with their families.
Furthermore, with this characteristic of modern telecommunication, people are able to explore the unknown world and receive more opportunities that are not confined to one region, which also provides the chance of doing the occasions socially. For instance, employees can find jobs in different countries just through online interviews when the employees meet the qualifications. Simultaneously, employers have more widen choices of selecting talents in one particular professional area, which could result in even more productive growth in companies’ development. This kind of globalization will promote more often in global communications since the talents are all recognized and collected to serve the whole world.
Although the technological development could result in some negative effects in reducing interaction among humans such as obsession and isolation in social media and computer games, which especially happened to immature youngsters, but with educational instructions from their parents and school professionals, the side-effect could be diminished. In order that, we can enjoy more convenient and efficient communications that technologies have bring us.
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 72
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes Why do you think this is the case Is this a good thing or a bad thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience Write at least 250 words 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ars, big improvements have been made in the IT world. Since the first iPhone, the birt...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...r parents and school professionals, the side-effect could be diminished. In order that, we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...t communications that technologies have bring us.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56598240469 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13102284648 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.0827186488 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.166666667 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139324426158 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483035771585 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599307903079 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881868395958 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541006100488 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ars, big improvements have been made in the IT world. Since the first iPhone, the birt...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...r parents and school professionals, the side-effect could be diminished. In order that, we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...t communications that technologies have bring us.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56598240469 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13102284648 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.0827186488 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.166666667 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139324426158 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483035771585 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599307903079 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881868395958 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541006100488 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.