Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are a lot of differences between the old generation to the new generation. How much freedom we need to provide to our kids always a controversial topic. Some parents think we need to give full freedom will improve their individuality and confidence. Some other parents are against this. According to my parents neither give full privilege nor give less privilege it should be balanced.
On one hand, permitting children whatever they want to do will build selfishness and they think whatever decision they taking will be the best. Some scientific research on this stated that the children’s who have full freedom in childhood impacted their mental growth. They always fight for their own decision to succeed and not listen to anyone and never think about the causes.
On the other hand, if parents not allowing children to pick or choose their own choice will impact on their future life. Which will lead to less confidence and lack of initiation. It may impact their future growth and they always look for dependency and never fight for their own choice. There are several case studies provided by the scientist on these types of children, the results of the survey showing that they work hard and struggle to succeed in their life and carrier. They habituated to learn how to compromise for any situation.
To sum up altogether, in the end our society needs people with good creative work and good decision-making skills. Hence, I request parents to give enough freedom but with boundaries. The balancing can bring the best possible results.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98846153846 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60364730521 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7197208864 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214926264929 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661149564103 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729058146717 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116710265913 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529664653717 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.