Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages

There are some people who believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings. This belief is based on the fact that these buildings will help in generating finance, encourage tourism and so on.

First, let’s take a look at buildings such as the Presidential Villa in Aso Rock Abuja. This structure serves as a symbolic building in Nigeria where the President of the country resides during his tenure. It is of necessity for the Presidential Villa to be preserved because it serves as a shelter to the President in power. Second, the Ojukwu Bunker which was named after the Biafran leader “Chukwuemeka Ojukwu” and served as a hideout for him and his generals during the Nigerian Civil War is an example of another building worth preserving. This structure has attracted international tourists, and schools visiting for educational purposes. Third, the palace of King Jaja of Opobo falls into the category of old buildings worth preserving. The preservation of this palace has attracted international tourists from all over the world and it has also attracted journalists too. It is also in the history books, so it is worth preserving.

In other words, I believe that the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh their disadvantages. Preserving the Aso Rock Villa will ensure the Head of State stays in a conducive environment and carries out his official duties effectively. An in-conducive environment would create distractions! Tourism helps the economy of a country thrive, so keeping our old buildings such as the Ojukwu Bunker and the Palace of King Jaja of Opobo would encourage tourists to visit.

In conclusion, I believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving and I believe their advantages outweigh their disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, second, so, third, in conclusion, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99227982801 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0086159552 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4608959881 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174922758868 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180331778515 0.0667982634062 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350307897872 0.151304729494 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115762216655 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.