Nowadays, entertainment for kid has become a controversial problem. While some people maintain that children shouldn’t have too much free time and better to give them more school works, in my opinion, I believe that they should entertain instead of more study.
First, although extra class may be good for kids in some ways, children should go out and discovery the wild life. An instance illustrates this action comes from the fact that in recent years, pupils are over charged by study at school whereas they don’t have time to contact with the nature. So they should spend more time for outdoor activities. This is not impractical but feasible, for example, parents and school can organize the picnics or field trips to help kids relaxing and touching the life.
Secondly, instead of doing more school works, there are a myriad of social reactions that children can participate. The most conspicuous one is going charity which helps to build the good sentiments at children. What is more, another action to be taken into consideration is visiting some cousins. This is because children now often lack of social skills. For example, they couldn’t remember their cousins or they don’t know how to express their sentiments. This is not incomprehensible because the aim of education is to train the kids to become good social member, these actions are therefore practical.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a perspective opinion, I believe that children shouldn’t be assigned too much school work. Instead, they should be give occasion to escape their ordinary and touching more the nature and doing more social actives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...of doing more school works, there are a myriad of social reactions that children can p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25650557621 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80848068231 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0683486224 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393543052986 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123427782488 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956605669703 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244412999311 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461801104325 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.