Some people believe that the good leaders are born whereas others hold the opinion that the leadership qualities could be obtained during the life Who represents the good leader qualities indeed
There is an old saying “Great leaders are born, not made.” It is still a hardcore belief of many but contrarians are of the view that leadership qualities can be learnt from life and those who acquires these skills through life are indeed great and successful leader. It will be interesting to brainstorm both viewpoints before jumping to any conclusion.
When we analyze classical views, we get wide set of reasoning behind their logic. Firstly, each individual is born with different personality traits and these features defines his mode of operandi. For example, some people are more dominating while others can be shy. Earlier style generally pops out to be leader whereas later turn to be the followers. Secondly, famous leaders such as Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, Mahatami Gandhi and many more were extremely influential leaders and were surrounded by numerous followers. A bird eye view of their life situations were not very different from many others of those times but these personalities had some by birth qualities which, eventually, turned that great warriors and helped them stood out of crowd.
On the other hand, contrarians also comes up with a long list of names, wherein, persons who did not have any leadership background and were of general personality during their childhood became great afterwards and lead many people. Few famous names among these were Saheed Bhagat Singh, Shaheed Udham Singh, Bhai Mani Singh, Mr Arvind Kejriwal and list goes on. These gentlemen suffered had many suffering during the lifespan. Such sufferings sharpens their skills and forced them to take charge in their hands to work towards improving others’ lives. People did follower them as well.
To conclude, above juxtaposition shows that leadership skills are not patented by one class of people. Some attributes are by birth while others are learnt from the life. But, those, which are learnt from life are more sharpen and related to practical in relevant circumstances.
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to study work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In the letter describe the sit 78
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family Give 73
- Fast food is a part of life in some places Some people think this has bad effects in lifestyle and diet Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that the good leaders are born whereas others hold the opinion that the leadership qualities could be obtained during the life Who represents the good leader qualities indeed 89
- Some people believe that the good leaders are born whereas others hold the opinion that the leadership qualities could be obtained during the life Who represents the good leader qualities indeed 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'sharpen'.
Suggestion: sharpen
...ng during the lifespan. Such sufferings sharpens their skills and forced them to take ch...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21806853583 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58453978236 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616822429907 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4562532329 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230968227558 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693558373175 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651251907003 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14240682091 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708009078145 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.