Some people believe that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. Others may think there are alternative ways to this problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A number of people think that longer sentences can help reduce the crime rate. However, this issue is not straightforward and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the longer penalties such as life in a prison for years cite the various benefits. These range from the decrease in the crime rate to gaining the social safety. In order to reduce the crime rate, criminals particularly murderers should be punished by the severest and the longest sentences. Due to the fact that they can realize serious consequences of their fault. If criminals do not accept the longer sentences, they will commit their errors in different ways. In addition, another argument is that living in the safe society is a real right for people. If governments did not consider tough punishments to criminals, the crime rate would increase in societies. Thus, individuals will have to live in an unsafe society in which everyone could permit yourself to do anything wrong without considering others.
By contrast, the opponents of the view point that there are a lot of alternative approaches by which states could punish the criminals. This group believes that living in prison, for instance, can be enough beneficial neither the societies nor the criminals. Indeed, states should employ the criminals to do some activities which can be helpful to people. For example, there is a wide range of community services that can be considered as the effective sentences. These types of punishments are useful not only to people or governments but also to the criminals. On the other words, the criminals could learn how it is possible to be useful to their societies.
On balance, although considering longer sentences may be required in some cases, it seems obvious that these kinds of penalties cannot have positive effects on both the crime rate and making changes into the criminals' attitude.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'criminals'' or 'criminal's'?
Suggestion: criminals'; criminal's
... crime rate and making changes into the criminals attitude.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04892966361 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68760193894 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0075437912 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174496121671 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555340379526 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531311998285 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121977798439 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570146007697 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.