People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of extending public transport systems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of up-to-the-minute transportation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that efficient transport networks can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, public transport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that less air pollution, as well as less congestion, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effectiveness of efficient public transport. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fewer traffic jams and pure air in cities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of governments, building new roads might increase the consequences of the traffic. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the extension of roads network relate to this reality that the demerits of the air pollution in cities pertain to overcrowding. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of air pollution is correlated negatively with people’s health.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of building an advanced public transport far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of less air pollution prove the significance of less commuting vehicles in cities, but also pinpoint outstanding implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fewer traffic jams and pure air in cities apparently ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.734375 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3594022528 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6328125 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.549977106 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156655103768 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549061145021 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039297461401 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899854710844 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412224820319 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.