Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued by a certain number of people that the violence rate will rise if policemen will be armed. However, I firmly discord with this kind of notion because it will reduce the crime rate in society. The following essay will discuss why policemen should carry weapons while doing their public duties to preserve a safe and secure environment in society.

Evidently, the prime reason behind carrying a gun is to deter criminal acts. Thieves or criminals would think twice or be scared before commencing any crime if they know police officers around them are armed. Consequently, violence and crime will significantly decline in society. For instance, a robber might stop his criminal actions or thought if he is afraid of police officials carrying guns and snipers that could shoot him from a long distance. On the contrary, failure to carry a weapon gives offenders a strong advantage in terms of the ability to commit violence without any corresponding risks.

Moreover, the other reason is that police officers can protect themselves and hostages from dangerous situations. Certainly, numerous criminals keep various harmful and life-threatening weapons, which they can use against not only police persons but also on hostages. Therefore, if there were safety precautions for police officials, there, as well as innocent lives of citizens could have come at a risk. To exemplify, in many terror attacks globally, the terrorists killed innocent individuals and policemen. Hence, in such circumstances, policemen should be armed for such necessary precautions.

To conclude, although some people oppose carrying weapons by police officers in fear of violence, I completely disagree with this kind of notion because to control and reduce crime rate as well as to save general public, police officials should carry a gun.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-14 shain 84 view
Essays by user shain :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd reduce crime rate as well as to save general public, police officials should carry a gun.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30136986301 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78340186684 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2257106655 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209409830178 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635172336147 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552538733424 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12842079642 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615757089294 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.