Some people believe that modern technology encourages more sociable behaviour. others say that this leads to lesser sociable behaviour. discuss both views with examples and provide your opinion.
There is a controversial issue about the influence of technological progress on people. Some social workers argue that it generally stimulates the development of public, while some families claim that it mostly weakens public behavior. This essay will discuss both points of view and agrees with idea of behavioral advantages to society.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers state that current technology strengthens social behavior. The first reason is that it facilitates human interaction. Youngsters, for example, tend to make more on-line friends, who share similar interests, if they have access to both laptops and the Internet connection. Another reason is that it allows people to learn more about the world. Human beings can develop trendy soft skills in the public, when they can keep in touch with the rest of the world by watching talk shows. Furthermore, it helps lonely people search the second half on dating websites. Many people, who are unable to approach the opposite gender due to their shyness, can easily make a romantic relationship through special websites, which sort people according to the match of their interests.
However, some families claim that technological advancement has some negative impacts on social interaction. They justify their viewpoint with the following arguments. Firstly, it destroys privacy in community. People, who prefer quietness around, often get irritated, because they cannot avoid the disturbing noise coming from various apparatus, which have become pervasive. Secondly, it gradually destroys family ties. People usually use mobile phones instead of communicating with each other, while they have meals in the circle of relatives, which makes family connections weaker over time. Moreover, it also decreases face-to-face communication. Many friends physically spend little time together, since they are accustomed to keeping in touch others through mobile phones. As a result, they are more dependent on technology than on their friends.
In conclusion, even though families have a negative opinion about the effect of technology on human behavior, I think that it actually boost social interaction by offering more opportunities for socializing.
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle Why do think this is How could this problem be solved 87
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society. Others argue that being a citizen involves more responsibilities. Discuss, what is your opinion? 78
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living and working in a foreign country. 61
- Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 73
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty. People, who prefer quietness around, often get irritated, because they cannot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58997050147 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80840521672 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1207149794 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147846972649 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429910293662 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382247995519 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093312209932 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253059821849 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.