There is a currently contentious argument about whether people have enough choices. I somewhat disagree with this notion base on more advantages of multiple options than drawbacks.
First of all, it is beneficial that have the chance to choose the type of work. Consequently, individuals can improve career satisfy and work efficiency working in the preferred industry and post. In contrast, it is limited to a person's ability if he has not a talent to do one job but has no choice to do it. For example, people have to farm whatever they can in the ancient era for that time only have agriculture.
Another benefit of many choices is entertainment from different kinds of food. That choice makes people's life enjoyment since they are delighted on the meal with several flavour dishes. For instance, banquet and buffet have various food that can satisfy everyone's appetite, so they are popular. On the other hand, it is boring to eat the same without an alternative for every day. Moreover, it is not healthy for that kind of diet for no choice with a lot of ingredients.
However, sometimes people feel too many choices base on wast of time for shopping since they are hesitated to buy. To more precise, these goods normally have the same functions or shapes that confuse shilly-shally customers to choose hardly and losing time. To illustrate, some buyers will wast time buying clothes which are all beautiful.
In conclusion, I somewhat disagree with the opinion that we have numerous choices, for that give us opportunities and a waste of time. Given this situation, we get benefits on choices but do not use it to hesitate on petty things.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...d post. In contrast, it is limited to a persons ability if he has not a talent to do on...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ferent kinds of food. That choice makes peoples life enjoyment since they are delighted...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
... to eat the same without an alternative for every day. Moreover, it is not healthy for that k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'choose'.
Suggestion: hardly choose
...that confuse shilly-shally customers to choose hardly and losing time. To illustrate, some bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89323843416 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69206673632 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.4966213131 49.4020404114 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182871077567 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588250255148 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448036464011 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112289473977 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497487680685 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.