Some people believe that price is the only consideration when buying something Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and include relevant examples

There are some people who believe that consideration should be given only to the price of something when buying it. In this case, I do not agree with this and I will state my opinions with instances below.

On the one hand, quality is a very significant factor to consider while in the process of purchasing something. The quality check or the quality of the goods will determine how long the product can last if it is looked into. For example, a company would check for quality before they go ahead to buy chairs to put in their waiting room. They need to be sure that the chair would last, so it is expedient to look out for quality. In addition, we ought to know if what we want to buy is necessary. In most cases, a lot of individuals follow the trend and buy things which are not relevant just to feel among. To illustrate, a young trader trying to build his business after hearing about a trending wrist watch goes ahead to buy it.

Consequently, only the price of a nuclear weapon should not be considered when we know the devastation it can cause to humanity. In our world today, countries are buying nuclear warheads without considering the harmful effects that it can cause. Further, sex traffickers pay huge amounts of money to buy victims once they are made available. As humans, we should consider the emotions of these people, and The kind of physical abuse that would be experienced.

In conclusion, I have made my points and I have also given instances. It is of essence that we should consider other things of importance whenever we want to buy anything. These opinions and examples will ensure that the right decisions are taken during any form of purchase.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61666666667 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54508458711 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.1754503216 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5625 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201870555974 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616467580245 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937422433432 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156559522751 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171710876005 0.056905535591 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61666666667 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54508458711 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.1754503216 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5625 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201870555974 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616467580245 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937422433432 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156559522751 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171710876005 0.056905535591 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.