Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree

Nowadays, some people are arguing that technological Inventions, such as mobile phones are making a lot of people socially less interactive. This is a major topic in the world today and I agree that mobile phones make people socially less interactive.

First, let’s take a look at social media apps, such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. These social media platforms tend to engage its audience because of the eye candy contents been displayed on their timelines. On the other hand, this is the main reason why you see a lot of people in the same spot and all of them are on their mobile phones and not socializing or talking to each other.

In addition, this technological invention has made it possible to download games to your mobile phones. After these games have been downloaded by the user of the mobile phone, it tends to distract them when they are in a social gathering. For instance, when you come to weddings you will notice that the wedding guests are all on their mobile phones and they are not paying attention to the ongoing event. In schools, kids don’t engage in conversations during their break time any longer like the old days because of the invention of mobile phones which make it possible to download games on to the device.

Furthermore, I want to discuss about picture taking with mobile phones. Technological invention has made it possible for cameras to be made available on phones. By this development, a lot of people focus more on taking pictures when they get to a social environment. Between the beginning and end of birthday parties, most guest are less socially interactive due to the fact that they’re engaged with taking pictures. The stories on social media platforms have taken pictures and video uploads to a whole new level because of the real time unlimited posts one can make.

To conclude, I agree that technological inventions, such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive whenever they are engaged with it.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, look, so, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91988130564 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64716036936 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495548961424 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4146234705 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449368719645 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162232353697 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156496943982 0.0667982634062 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304710224945 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170718339243 0.056905535591 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.