Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting travelling to work parks and gardens close to city centres should be replaced by apartment buildings for commuters to live in However others disagree with this Discuss both these

Essay topics:

Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting (travelling to work), parks and gardens close to city centres should be replaced by apartment buildings for commuters to live in. However, others disagree with this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The traffic congestion is increasing at fast pace as a result people need more time to reach their office. A section of people believes that replacing all parks and gardens with skyscrapers to stay in will resolve this issue. However, many of them oppose this notion, as this idea is not effective in long run. I will scrutinize both this aspects in my further paragraphs before forming an opinion at the end.

To embark on, as our economy is increasing, so number of offices are also increasing. Earlier, people had fix time duration to reach office and short as well. However, due to traffic congestion and population, people have to spend more time while traveling to or from office. Many people think that this issue can be managed by demolishing all playgrounds and gardens inside city and establishing new residential complexes will eliminate extra time required while travelling to office.

However, many people do not accord with this idea as it has limited success for few years only. Moreover, adverse effect of removing parks are far more dangerous than time loss while commuting. Because, parks and gardens are the best source for carbon dioxide absorption and physical activities for children and adults. Can anyone guarantee that replacing parks will solve our time travel losses? Instead, government should encourage people to use public transport rather than private cars. Secondly, office times of various regions should be arranged in such as a way that optimum numbers of vehicles are on road during office hours.

To recapitulate, replacing park with new building will not at all help our excess time spending issue rather it will worsened our environment. Encouragement to use public transport, office timings reshuffling are probable solution to save time while reaching workplace.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-29 prasanta 93 view
2019-04-24 BIBHU KALITA 96 view
Essays by user BIBHU KALITA :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ive in long run. I will scrutinize both this aspects in my further paragraphs before...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
...re also increasing. Earlier, people had fix time duration to reach office and short...
^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
...re also increasing. Earlier, people had fix time duration to reach office and short...
^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'worsen'
Suggestion: worsen
...cess time spending issue rather it will worsened our environment. Encouragement to use p...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20890410959 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64625439431 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7871330517 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292287828926 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963246562825 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540241659466 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181103751899 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395506870542 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.