These days, in technology age, there has been a plethora of distinctive learning platforms. Henceforth, students can have numerous ways to approach knowledge, two ways which are used more than others are distant and face-to-face learning. This has caused a heated controversy whether which one is better. It is believed by a school of thought that tertiary learning done on campus is more noteworthy than learning via the web, while a number of people emphasize a specific assertion that it is an ideal avenue. It appears to me that the merits which studying on the internet brings far outweigh but I will delve both view points.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that conventional education brings certain virtues for pupils. Juniors may connect with their tutors and classmates while attending face-to-face sessions, which gives them the opportunity to enhance their interpersonal communication skills and this frequently refrain a sense of isolation and lack of competition for the graduates. To illustrate, if they have any queries or answers, they would boldly ask instructors and argue with peers to convey their views. Eventually, teachers can monitor their pupils when lecturing in classes. A number of trainers have a short attention span and are more prone to do other things while attending online classes, consequently, students who study on campus will be more self-discipline and, therefore, achieve better academic results.
On the other hand, I opine internet-based education. To begin with, a virtual study is favorable for its flexibility but it also allows apprentices to learn from any location in lieu of being restricted by geographical boundaries like in traditional classes. In the COVID-19 era, learners can readily access their devices and attend lectures or tutorials from the comfort of their homes and hostels as long as there is internet service. What is more, online lectures can be recorded and shared which permits students to access the learning material at any time they need. Thus, electronic learning offers scholars the flexibility of time and place in education. Another benefit of online learning is reduced financial burden. Distant learning is far more affordable as compared to physical learning. This is because online learning minimizes transportation fees, student meals, and school facilities. As a result, every student from the poor to the prosperous ones can have the equal opportunities to learn and the rate of illiteracy is step-by-step declined.
In conclusion, both avenues have their own strong point, accordingly, it seems the best when pupils can mix these two methods to learn more effectively.
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 89
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 89
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34285714286 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94655338841 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57619047619 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2854874742 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162998310224 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444989425515 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539769965669 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102140697181 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052833048841 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.