Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for charity improve the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree

It is a commonly held belief that unpaid community works should be compulsory in high schools. However, some assert that there are a number of benefits in this trend, I completely believe that it ought not to be part of school programs.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a school is a place for training children. Its chief aim is to prepare students to be a well-educated person from job skills to ethical values for the forthcoming society. Simply put, tend to do unpaid works for communities could be part of students' training. A good illustration of this is some specific schools in different parts of the world which educate moral values to students. That is to say, learning ethical values and the right companionship along with other academic courses such as geometric and mathematics, students feel more responsible in order to help their surrounding people.
Yet another compelling argument is that compulsory activity may kill motives in children. To put it differently, the more children are forced to do specific work, the more they avoid it. Take Muslim schools that have some compulsory programs as an example. Students in these schools should pray every day and sometimes participate in a compulsory religious ceremony. These initiatives make children uninterested and could adversely affect their beliefs.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that schools should just be a place to educate children. And unpaid community works are completely personal decision which returns to once training who have obtained from the school or even family.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.877328178 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5958751337 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311619736257 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107941164615 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681488989082 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191125271984 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432767172417 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.