Environment pollution in today's world is the burning topic everywhere. Some people are of the opinion that where lot of non-recyclable waste is rubbished from homes, there is a dire need to enforce laws that are strictly adhered to so that we can safeguard nature for present and future generations. I agree that such laws will definitely help to curb pollution but it will also need help from citizens to understand the sensitivity of the issue. In this essay i will provide some facts to compare both sides of the coin.
Firstly, it is the responsibility of every person to preserve the environment and take necessary actions towards achieving it. There is so much waste everyday discarded from homes which is mostly non-recyclable. One of the main components that we use in our everyday life is plastic which cannot be recycled. There are already some places where use of plastic in any form, may be it be bottles or plastic bags, is banned by law. It explains how deterrent it is form times to come. We are creating our own graves by being dependent on such things. Plastic should be prohibited by law across the globe to make world a better place to live.
Furthermore, other than laws people must be educated about recycling of resources and awareness must be created through dissemination of public health using advertisements and other social media. It is imperative now that everyone must contribute to saving the natural resources and keeping the environment neat and clean. It is already picking up in some countries where paper bags are already becoming popular and people are resorting other alternatives without any legal actions from the government. This kind of effort perpetuates in the community from word to mouth approach and must be encouraged.
I hereby conclude by stating that with proliferation of levels of pollution in last few years, it has already reached a peak level where it will only going to be worse for our future generations to survive. Hence it is needed that laws must be enforced by government agencies and on the other hand people should also come forward and help government to achieve this united goal.
- These days free music and free films are available online. Is this is positive or a negative development, Give reason for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 78
- Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sensitivity of the issue. In this essay i will provide some facts to compare both...
^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...laces where use of plastic in any form, may be it be bottles or plastic bags, is banne...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... for our future generations to survive. Hence it is needed that laws must be enforced...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92032967033 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76873333008 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552197802198 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3871005544 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.352941176 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181762957717 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507628525371 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542146559005 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108151106954 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315369897257 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.