Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product such as a cell phone or a service e g medical treatment Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cell phone) or a service (e.g. medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree?

It is considered that price is the most important thing when buying a product for some people. I disagree with this opinion and think there are some other aspect to consider when buying a product.

First of all, the price is one of the thing to consider about when buying a product, but not the most important thing. There are something else to think about, such as brand and quality of the product. For example, buying a smartphone, some people pursue to buy the most expensive and newest one as they think it is the best quality than any others. In the other hand, some people consider the brand more than the price. My sister is a huge fan of Apple products, she always select Apple products for her mobile phone, laptop and some technology items. So brand is most important for her to consider when buying a product.

Secondly, for some people, the usability of the product is the most important thing to consider. They are more care about the function, size and warranty of the product. For instance, the price of a car is one of the thing to consider, but some people think the speed, petrol type, manual or automatic and so on are more important than price. A friend of mine was looking to buy a car for picking children to go school and shopping for home stuffs. The most important thing to consider for her is not price, is the size of car which can fit her children and shopping stuffs.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the price is not the most important thing to consider when buying a product. For some people, there are something else to consider, such brand and usability.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-17 abhi1389 78 view
2018-07-17 abhi1389 78 view
2018-05-08 Netra patel 75 view
2018-02-19 sherin rijo 89 view
2020-01-01 MustafaR 82 view
Essays by user lisa1128520 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'aspects'?
Suggestion: aspects
... opinion and think there are some other aspect to consider when buying a product. F...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55709342561 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33243147535 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401384083045 0.561755894193 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9594352308 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435662199512 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202990860464 0.084324248473 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137515260634 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354493703782 0.151304729494 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881611530242 0.056905535591 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.