Some people point out that there will be less international travel in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?
International travel is an important aspect of the modern era because it is considered as the foremost vehicle for cultural exchange for people around the globe as well as an important contributor to the world economy. It is said that there would be less cross-country travel in the near future because of stringent visa policies and unaffordable travel budget resulting from high fuel prices. Though the trend seems to be true, I still hope it would not happen.
To begin with, opponents of international travel may argue that cutting non-essential, for example, international flights will definitely save the planet immeasurable barrels of crude oil, which shows human's care and love for the planet. Moreover, this will also help in reducing pollution resulting from fossil fuels being used in transportation. Additionally, safety problems caused by travel-related crimes are never concerned if international travel is no longer a choice for holiday plan.
On the other side, reduced cross-boundary travel has more disadvantages than its advantages. First of all, the tourism industry will be adversely impacted by such reduction. The Tourism industry is the backbone of many economies in the world. Countries like, for example, Malaysia, Thailand are majorly dependent on international visitors. International visitors bring with them money which they inject into the economy they are visiting, this is excellent for businesses. Additionally, a decline in cross-country travel has appalling effects on the aviation industry. Such a decline will result in unemployment and will hinder the country's development. Moreover, international travel is considered as a tool for culture or art exchange around the world. This cultural exchange results in enhanced understanding among people in the different part of the world. Due to increased understanding, severer conflicts can be dramatically alleviated.
To sum up, international travel is an important aspect of human life and a crucial contributor to the world's economy. We had better not spoil a ship for the half-penny-worth of tar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...n life and a crucial contributor to the worlds economy. We had better not spoil a ship...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, for example, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54375 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27394424777 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4653369831 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201091963422 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062116206257 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326295664669 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123695654984 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400413645649 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.