Some people prefer to live in a house, while others there are more advantages to living in an apartment.Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to live in a house, while others there are more advantages to living in an apartment.

Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?

The home is a place where one can feel comfortable in living. But is it advantageous to live in a house rather than an apartment? There are a huge number of people who dispute this notion of living in an apartment while the equivalent numbers are in favour of it. In my opinion, the hordes of demographic factors play a decisive role in such situation and living in an apartment is more beneficial as per my view.

The standalone house carries various benefits like a privacy and a security to mention a few but all of these come at an exorbitant price. for example, an independent residence mostly covers a large space which is becoming costly as the population is increasing. Furthermore, the owner has to get individual municipal permits and have to install separate security systems to prevent unwanted circumstances. off-course, many people cannot afford to have the lavish accommodation wherein all the amenities are provisioned.

Conversely, living in an apartment can be beneficial not only because of affordability but also in sharing the resources. The buildings consisting apartments provide many facilities which are otherwise not in easy access. For instance, the basement parking, common security service, and sports facilities like gym and swimming pool etc. The residents would have to go outside their houses to get such services at an added cost. Another advantage of living in apartments could be a strong social bond as people get to see each other in places like community centres, elevators and common areas. Finally, the population of the world is increasing at the enormous rate and the common housing place could solve the problem of homelessness.

To sum up, considering the limited space available, we can provide shelter to a large number of people, if we promote the common living. A piece of land measuring 1000m2 may accommodate 50 families instead of a family while maintaining the same living standards.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-11 Prachi Agrawal 78 view
2019-07-30 dangtheanh@gmail.com 73 view
2019-05-12 jp30101995 73 view
2019-01-29 vinshu koul 61 view
2019-01-29 vinshu koul 61 view
Essays by user Ata1986g :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...l of these come at an exorbitant price. for example, an independent residence mostl...
^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Off-course
...tems to prevent unwanted circumstances. off-course, many people cannot afford to have the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ce available, we can provide shelter to a large number of people, if we promote the common living...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11285266458 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94928187503 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58934169279 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7666053921 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318663155504 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103531568415 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131438474899 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181134787942 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134038045739 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.