Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets.Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets.
Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

With the introduction of online shopping, people shop their food in different ways. While some buy their food in supermarkets, others use online for food shopping. This essay will discuss why shopping food in traditional way is beneficial, but why online shopping for food is ultimately superior.

At first, getting their food by going to markets directly has advantages over online shopping. Shoppers actually can see the freshness of food that they are buying, which means the food sellers have to guarantee the quality of their product to satisfy consumers. For instance, sellers in the fish market will try to keep fish as fresh as possible by getting fish every day and putting some ice under them since consumers can observe how fresh the products are and choose them. In this sense, buying food in offline markets would be better than online shopping.

Secondly, online food shopping makes everything easier than offline shopping. All you need to do is go to the online mall, choose whatever you want, click them and wait to be delivered. All procedures take place in one place, wherever you have access the internet. To be specific, you do not need to spend time and money on going back and forth to markets to buy food. Also, buying food online is much cheaper than traditional shopping because it does not take up the space for storing and display for the customers. This advantage can be beneficial to online shopping buyers as well as sellers in that they can save money.

In conclusion, the internet has changed the way of food shopping, either online shopping or offline markets. This essay discussed why offline food shopping has benefits, but why online shopping is tremendously superior. In my opinion, online shopping would be better in terms of convenience and money saving.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-28 kshama123 61 view
2019-06-27 Faby777 78 view
2019-03-18 Lighthouse 61 view
2019-01-13 koko 61 view
Essays by user koko :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...you do not need to spend time and money on going back and forth to markets to buy food. ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97682119205 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51059986968 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2689067074 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287349590516 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118602814473 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804801252147 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209505104508 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994417184267 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.