No one could deny that money is the most important resource in the 21st century. Therefore, the ability to control it is significant skill in the modern world. A considerable number of people think that giving pocket money to kids regularly will decrease their financial problems in the future. I share similar views with the people who agree pocket money given at early ages will teach them how to use money.
Firstly, everyone makes mistakes and learns from these mistakes. When children get pocket money first times, they will make mistakes such as spending bigger part of the budget at the first part of the week, day or duration that they got the money, and they will face with some financial problems at the rest of this duration. In this way, they will learn how to manage it, how to spend it, and not to waste it. Additionally, as I mentioned before the money is the most important resource in the modern world. Pocket money, especially if earned through chores, enables them to learn what money is actually worth, and its value.
On the other hand, No one could achieve something valuable without any aim. Therefore, having the aims at early ages can be important for the future life of children and teenagers. By gradually saving some of their money towards a goal, children develop a sense of purpose and achievement. They also learn to value possessions more when they spend money for it.
Consequently, taking into consideration the constructive effects of getting pocket money, working for it, spending, it I would agree with the idea of pocket money will reduce money problems of kids in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oney is actually worth, and its value. On the other hand, No one could achieve ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84892086331 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45441858524 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546762589928 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1002470853 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370753255578 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11915780092 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944108240815 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236818982513 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362970915803 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.