Some people say that the current obsession with technology and the internet means that we are creating a generation of people that have poor social skills. Do you agree with this statement?
What distinguishes the 21st century is the introduction of the internet. Some people believe that the new generation lacks social skills because people are obsessed with new gadgets and the internet. I oppose this belief due to several reasons which will be discussed in the following.
To begin with, the internet has actually made people more sociable with better social skills compared to what they used to be. What I mean is that the cornerstone of the society is talking, not being in the same place. Thus, nowadays, people socialize more than past owing to the spread of the internet and the fact that they can simply talk to anybody no matter where he lives thanks to the new technology. Research has shown that an individual in the 21st century gets to know five times more people compared to one in the 20th century.
Moreover, the advancements in technology have helped half of the community to develop social skills. In the past, one was forced to meet others in person had he wanted to make new friends, which was a torment for introverted and shy characters. On the other hand, these days, one does not need to even leave his room for contacting people and becoming friends with others, making introverted people socially active.
Granted what was said, it must be taken into account that social gatherings play an important role in the human’s lifestyle. It is observed that young people have trouble in these ceremonies and lack the skills needed for socializing in person inasmuch as they are used to chat behind the computer.
To sum up, even though the generation raised cannot perform in parties and gatherings socially, the new technologies helped people to develop better social skills. The internet aided its users to meet more people as well as easing the act of taking part in society for introverts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | enassar | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | parsaeian | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Aidin_1805 | 58 | view |
- Write a letter to the shop you bought an equipment that you use for your jobin your letterdescribe the problems with the equipmentexplain how his problem is affecting your worksay what you want the shop or company to do 73
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:describe the training courseexplain what the company could do to help yousay how t 87
- many people prefer to spend money and not save it. what are the reasons ? is this a positive or negative development ? 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends. They have just sent you some photos of your holiday.Write a letter to your friends. In your letter:•thank them for the photos and f 73
- there has been several complaints about the reception area where visitors to your company arrive. Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improved. write a letter to your managerin your letter:describe the complaints that hav 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to chatting'.
Suggestion: used to chatting
...ializing in person inasmuch as they are used to chat behind the computer. To sum up, even...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as for, i mean, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90384615385 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54020110041 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9173665709 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303356826725 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103866619813 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08660865041 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171104859453 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569635739211 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.