In recent times one of the most debated issues relates to the most significant subject in schools. Some assert that knowledge about history is more important than other subjects, while the other contend that learning related to technology has more significance than history. However, both arguments seem to be logical and both have their own importance.
On the one side of the argument there are people who reason that it ought to be important for pupils to gain knowledge about ancient times in school days. First and foremost, before making any inventions in the world of science, it should be necessary for inventor to access history about that invention, which prevent them to avoid mistakes which were happened in the past. For Instance, A great scientist, Thomas Edison, who invented light bulb after having 999 failures. It is advisable to refer experiences of Edison to eliminate mistakes which were made by him. The second point in this context is that history helps younger people understand their own culture and how their culture and country have evolved. Through history, they could learn how their forefathers experienced and suffered in the past in order to make their country what it is today.
On the other side, the other group believes that our future can be made better only with the help of science and technology. Hence, this subject ought to be considered as a must in a school. To elaborate, the primary reason is that these subjects can provide students with foundation knowledge which help them to adapt to the technological development. Further, in some countries, the majority of workforce work in science - related fields. As a result, students tend to focus on these subjects to seek well. To exemplify, Germany is a country, in which most of people are associated in technical professions, for them it is important to earn technical knowledge in very early age to explore themselves.
To conclude, science and technology and history are interconnected with each other. Before performing any advancement in technology, it is viable to refer past experiences related to that field to understand the basics and mistakes which were made by other people.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999 2000 and 2007 79
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the government should establish free library in each town other believe that it is a waste of money Since people can access the internet at home to obtain information 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...emplify, Germany is a country, in which most of people are associated in technical professions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...nt in technology, it is viable to refer past experiences related to that field to understand the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...takes which were made by other people.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10584958217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71620508462 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5292258493 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29047830923 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855998108106 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630634401229 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176391266715 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770811394694 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...emplify, Germany is a country, in which most of people are associated in technical professions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...nt in technology, it is viable to refer past experiences related to that field to understand the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...takes which were made by other people.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10584958217 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71620508462 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5292258493 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29047830923 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855998108106 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630634401229 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176391266715 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770811394694 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.