Some people say that what children watch influences their behaviour. Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behaviour most.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While it is true that watching TV affects children, it is difficult to determine whether it is the content of the programs of the length of time spent watching them that has a more significant impact on children. It seems to me that although the amount of time does affect youngsters, it is the content of the programs that has a more marked influence on them.
On the one hand, the consequences of watching TV for a long period of time can be deleterious. Firstly, the longer children are exposed to TV programs, the more likely it is for them to become addicted to watching television. When children become over-reliant on television for entertainment, they might neglect engagement in outdoor activities. This may result in a sedentary lifestyle that is highly detrimental to their physical health. More importantly, excessive TV watching impairs children's communication abilities, so they find it hard to play or live in harmony with others. As a result, children would feel discouraged from having real interactions with people around them if they spent a huge amount of time in front of the screen, which may hinder their development of social skills.
On the other hand, it is the broadcasted images that have the most direct effects on young viewers. Firstly, in most countries, the majority of TV shows present glamorize depictions of inappropriate materials such as violence, drug abuse or casual sex, thus youngsters may adopt unhealthy habits and improper behaviour. For example, they might fall under the impression that the use of alcoholic drinks is fashionable without being aware of the health risks they carry and later end up consuming these substances. Besides, in our modern consumer society, commercials also affect how children behave. Unwary young viewers could be easily swayed by captivating advertisements for junk food or video games, products whose target audience includes children, and so may pester their parents to buy these goods impulsively.
In conclusion, although both factors have their own implications, I believe the element with more considerable impacts on children is the content. Hence, parental involvement is essential in controlling children's TV viewing habits and in shaping a child's values to help them enter adult life with a healthy mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | jdsmss | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Rifat shanta | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ankita7443 | 67 | view |
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- More and more people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 78
- You received a letter from your friend informing you about his elderly parents are coming to visit in your area and he is asking for your advise on- which places they should visit- where should they live- Invite them to do something with you 70
- Some people think that the government is responsible for looking after the elderly. Others believe that it should be family members. Who do you think should take responsibility? 73
- Some people feel that the media has the strongest impact on people’s lives. Others feel that it is politicians who have the most control over the way people lives. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... consequences of watching TV for a long period of time can be deleterious. Firstly, the longe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23243243243 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94246757207 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597297297297 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.25796817 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.066666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233353547114 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707466154241 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031858472662 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12843029661 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243710594646 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.