Some people think that activities of free-time should be planned while others disagree. Discuss both sides and include examples and relevant data from your own experience.
Effective spending of a day off, weekend or holidays has always been an issue for many people. While some of then, as well as me, believe that leisure activities should be planned in advance, others disagree with this claim. There are valid arguments from both sides, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, detailed planning for future activities may be significantly money-saving. For instance, according to my personal experience, the purchase of tickets for planes or trains will be not so much expensive in the case of six months before the trip. At the same time, in hot periods, such as summer or Christmas holidays, the cost of tickets may become astronomic and be not affordable for potential tourists. Further, having a complex strategy of holidays, such as an explicit route, seems to be significantly time-saving as well. For example, gathering information about the schedule of local public transport in a destination area may allow to avoid any delays on the way. Finally, due to an excellent plan, causes of the emergency situations may be mitigated or even prevented. For example, traveling to some place for holidays, people may gather extra information about emergency services in that area.
On the other hand, some people may mention the special term, namely, hot tickets, which may be bought in a very short period before holidays and be even cheaper than booking tickets in advance. However, this way has many disadvantages, due to the limitation of numbers of such tickets and places to visit. Further, some people tend to claim, that free-time activities without any arrangements, when somebody cannot imagine a place, which he or she visits tomorrow, may be intriguing, thrilling and, as a result, contributes to the effectiveness of relaxing.
All in all, despite the view of absence of necessity to plan free time, I would argue that organizing leisure time events berforehand would be more rational than spontaneous decisions.
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes? What are its problems? 11
- Some people say that schools should spend more money on the best equipment others say that more experienced teachers should be hired Discuss both views and give your opinion 64
- Some people think that activities of free-time should be planned while others disagree. Discuss both sides and include examples and relevant data from your own experience. 89
- Some people think that activities of free-time shall be planned while others disagree. Discuss both sides and include examples and relevant data from your own experience. 78
- Some people say that schools should spend more money on the best equipment others say that more experienced teachers should be hired Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoiding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: avoiding
...ansport in a destination area may allow to avoid any delays on the way. Finally, due to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85241995343 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5044850896 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220067238756 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771249970526 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601368041087 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140570747902 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427524711812 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.