Some people think that activities of free-time should be planned while others disagree. Discuss both sides and include examples and relevant data from your own experience.
Effective spending of a day off, weekend or holidays has always been a burning issue in modern society. While some people, as well as me, believe that leisure activities should be planned in advance, others disagree with this claim. There are valid arguments from both sides which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, detailed planning for future activities may be significantly money-saving. For instance, according to my personal experience, the purchase of tickets for planes or trains will be not so much expensive in the case of 6 months before a trip. Whereas, in hot periods, such as summer or Christmas holidays, the cost of tickets may reach a high level and be not affordable for possible tourists. Further, having a complex strategy of rest days, such as an explicit route, seems to be significantly time-saving as well. For example, gathering information about the schedule of local public transport in a destination area may allow avoiding any delay on the way. Finally, due to an excellent plan, causes of the emergency situations may be mitigated or even prevent. For example, going to someplace for holidays, people may gather extra information about emergency services in that area.
On the other hand, some people may mention the special term, hot tickets, which may be bought in a very short period before holidays and be even chipper than taking tickets in advance. However, this way has many disadvantages, due to the limitation of numbers of such tickets and places to visit. Further, some people tend to clam, that free-time activities without any arrange, when somebody cannot imagine a place which he or she visits tomorrow, maybe intriguing and thrilling and, as a result, contribute to the effectiveness of relaxing.
All an all, despite the view that it seems to be mot necessary to plain free time, I would feel that organizing free-time events in advance would be more rational than spontaneous decisions.
- You visited a town last month and told your friend that you would like to meet However you could not make it Write a letter to your friend In your letter you should Express your apology Why you could not meet Making an arrangement to meet him 73
- A lot of social problems can be related to teenagers these days. Some feel that this is because parents are not able to spend enough time to take care of their teenage children. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that it is important to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- A colleague at work is organizing a goodbye party which you are not able to attend. Write a latter to him/her.In the letter you should:Explain reason why you cannot attendgood memories you have spenthow you will stay in touch 73
- Some people say that schools should spend more money on the best equipment others say that more experienced teachers should be hired Discuss both views and give your opinion 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06501547988 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79248728195 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616099071207 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5372817015 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228994764604 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758446711642 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663932610161 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144335201428 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564283434095 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.