Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree?
According to recent research, nowadays, most of the street crimes are conducted by teenagers and this issue is increasing at an alarming rate. Some people assert that young people should do some unpaid work in their spare time and contribute to helping their local community. This approach would not only help a certain individual but will be beneficial on a bigger scale as well. I completely agree with this approach as it has innumerable advantages. I shall elaborate my stance with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, predominantly, teenagers would achieve a sense of responsibility by participating in the local community unpaid work. The contribution would be solely at their will as there is no payment for it. Working for the community at an early stage, they would be in a better position to analyze the issues and the problems people are struggling with. This would urge a sense of responsibility in them and they would be more mature and responsible citizens when they grow up. For instance, I personally know a fellow who used to participate in social work and he grew up to be a human rights activist.
To elucidate my stance further, society would be equally benefited by adopting this phenomenon. There would be a drastic drop in street crimes and also community issues like use of drugs by teenagers and dirtiness. According to the survey of London University, 80% of school students who participated in voluntarily community work did not conduct any misbehavior or illegal act.
To summarize the aforementioned, I reiterate that teenagers participating in the community unpaid work would bring numerous merits to the individuals as well as to society. It is suggested that parents should encourage their children to participate in community work in order to understand society dilemmas and how they can contribute to eradicating the issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, as to, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13225806452 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04878986928 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9528956745 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35413526232 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114632100795 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852796220516 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209937611852 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700877562449 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.