Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Decades have witnessed the fact that international sports events have a great influence on a variety of national aspects. Whilst it has been argued by some that organizing such an international event is a valuable opportunity for the country, there is a school of thought that holds that it might impact negatively on host countries. Both assertions have rational reasons which will be elaborated on in this essay but I believe that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, some people are afraid that there are challenges in financial burden and national security that a host country has to be confronted with when handling international sports tournaments. Firstly, the process of preparing for these events often demands the upgradation of infrastructure while most of those amenities normally fall into disuse after the programs have taken place which can cost a great deal of money not only at the investment stage but also in maintenance later. For the World Cup 2014, it took Brazil several years to revitalize its cities and construct various facilities including stadiums and indoor athletics arenas to meet the world-class standard. In addition, a negative aspect of this situation is the risk of chaos and security on the grounds of the uncontrolled flow of travelers to the hosting areas. Robberies, prostitution, or even terrorism are potential hazards that organizers have to deal with.
On the other hand, I believe that there are better grounds for arguing that host nations can obtain benefits in terms of economy and reputation if a global-scale sports competition is organized in this country. First and foremost, it is an indisputable fact that mega-events create a noticeable surge in revenue, especially in travel, hospitality, and lucrative advertising contracts which is attributed to a massive influx of tourists from all over the world. A case in point is Vietnam, which registered an escalation in the GDP index created during Sea Games 22, particularly in the hosting region. Secondly, major events are likely to draw global attention to the hosting nations which is a golden prospect for them to promote cultural and traditional images and gain global exposure even long after the competitions end. For instance, The 2008 Olympic Games marked China’s emergence as a major global player which presented a chance for China to show the world how “democratic, open, civilized, friendly, and harmonious” it is.
In conclusion, although sports events come at the expense of a few immediate problems, the benefits of sales proliferation of products and services and cultural promotion are of greater significance. In my opinion, host nations can also consider the option of sharing an event with a neighboring country to spread the risk and still enjoy the long-term interest.
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 73
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more people today are spending large amounts of money on their complexions to look younger Why do people want to look younger Do you think this is a positive or negative progression 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37528089888 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06960863294 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591011235955 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2282664962 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.466666667 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214028856917 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661122523316 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557995570386 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127948682869 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251021746206 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.