Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that a massive time and budget should be spent on wild animal protection. While I agree that it could be better to spend the money on the human population.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some believe that wild animals should be conserved. One reason for this is that they are one of the most important factors contributing to the balance of the ecosystem. If the disappearance of wild animals continues, then humans may face an ecological crisis that resulted directly in their survival. Take whales, for example, whales help regulate the flow of food by maintaining a stable food chain and ensuring that certain animal species cannot overpopulate the ocean. The extinction of whales may alter the ecosystem in the ocean forever.
On the other hand, I am convinced that a massive amount of money should be spent on the improvement of the human population. The increase in population can contribute to the development of the country’s economy as there will be a sufficient amount of labor for every production infrastructures companies. Moreover, the innovation in the field of technology can appear as the enhancement of population can provide human resources for further study and investigation.
In conclusion, I believe that wild animals should receive a huge amount of time and money for conservation purposes with their crucial role in the balance of the ecosystem. Thus, it is important for improving the human population as it devotes to the success of the economy of the country and provides enough resources to innovate the country’s technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld be spent on wild animal protection. While I agree that it could be better to spen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03766426352 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4195875233 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285827287405 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106181893934 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083803263875 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189915228322 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883180945004 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.