Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both these view and give your opinion.
It is often said that people should have friends who always share their idea. However, the issue is not entirely straight forward, and arguments can be made against the opinion. This essay will discuss both sides of the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those how support choosing friends with similar ideas may probably benefit from a more harmonious life. They cite to the benefits that this way of life can bring to people from all walks of life, ranging from less struggling to decide on the crucial dilemmas in their family and social life to saving time and energy in their choosing proses. Moreover, people usually establish relationships to have pleasurable moments with new friends. It means that making friends who are polar opposite and do not have any things in common with you is somehow meaningless because they may soon turn to a constant nagging, which may bother you all the time. Hence, it seems beneficial to develop a relationship with someone who is close to our world as it may lead to fast compromise, more pleasure, and more consistency in their life.
On the other hand, the supporters of choosing friends with different ideas truly claim that these people seem to suffer less failure and enjoy more success in their life. It appears that communication with a wide variety of people not only may it lead to in-depth knowledge of our personality, but it also broadens our horizon. Therefore, it seems that we can make use of their experience and find the shortest way to success. Furthermore, it is rightfully a common knowledge that friends with a different perspective more likely act as a mirror, meaning that they can help us see the error of our ways. Examples can be seen in the life of many celebrities who have had a metric rise to fame and fortune just because of choosing the right friends who have positively reflected on their personality. Thus, the more our social network is divorce, the more we are close to success.
In conclusion, although friends with the same interest may lead us to harmony and pleasure in our both social and private life, it seems advisable to forge relationships with people who sometimes think different because not only do they help us to find our way to a successful life, but they may also help us to acquire insight knowledge of our weakness and defects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this how' or 'those hows'?
Suggestion: this how; those hows
...e a concluding view. On the one hand, those how support choosing friends with similar i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common knowledge'.
Suggestion: common knowledge
... success. Furthermore, it is rightfully a common knowledge that friends with a different perspecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...hink different because not only do they help us to find our way to a successful life, but they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76412776413 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56245685356 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488943488943 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7249408495 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257459380686 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957716458426 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708087442896 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179940096225 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532201561369 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.