Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as
museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a
whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
Spending national fund on cultural facilities is a concern for a great many people today, as we see the society suffering increasing demand from lack of effective education scheme, unemployment and poverty. However, to say that governments should regard this one issue as their main priority may be a rather simplistic view.
Granted, it is correct that establishing cultural services should be among our greatest concerns. Without the development of cultural premises, people will not be familiar with their cultural heritage, leading to detachment of civilization from both their ancient cultural treasure and contemporary culture. However, by focusing on this topic to the exclusion of others we run the risk of neglecting a range of other, equally grave challenges.
Foremost among these other challenges appear to be the question of successful education programme, by which I mean the educational scheme that prepare student for dealing with real-life difficulties creatively. If this problem is not addressed, the society potentially face ineffective educated workforce who are not only able to solve problems of society, but they also contribute to both wasting of national resources and worsening of unemployment issue, leading to culture deterioration. Another challenge which is at least equal to the education is the need to reduce unemployment, which would enable those populations to improve their standard of living, quality of life and enhancing their culture. Finally, there is the question of poverty and the need to find ways to reduce this problem. Industrialization is by far the best way to generate job opportunity and reduce poverty in societies. By spending money on industry, governments would create revenues and economic stability, leading to more jobs, less poverty, and cultural development.
To conclude, funding on cultural premises is certainly a major priority. However, it should be seen as one among a range of issues to be solved, and the solutions themselves could lead to the development of cultural amenities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, at least, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49211356467 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07148622087 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7398700284 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152380800939 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530357781719 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358176844962 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974143838179 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00632872614317 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.