There is no doubt that choosing a friend and maintaining a friendship is indispensable to stay mentally healthy that's why some echelons of society admit that friend should be chosen of those people who have similar views, however. others consider that a friend should have different view
on matters. This essay will be discussed the both opinions before embarking my view.
Having same thinking on matters is bring least chances of conflicts, it would bring friendship long lasting. If two person have similarities they can choose same study and select same profession. For example, if both friends have keen interest in table tennis , they will spend huge quality of time together without any disruption as a result, bonding automatically increased. Furthermore, it not only helps to enhance their knowledge on same subjects but also swell chances of get job in t ha same sector.
On the other side of coin, argumentative friends may be escalated the knowledge on views and also gain chances to view new places, new type of movies which not experienced before in the life and public maintain relationship with quarrel people which can helpful in order to enhance the quality of co-operation. Generally, these qualities are required in renowned companies for doing job.
To encapsulate, Given aforementioned information, it is abundantly clear that choice of depend on person mental ability, In my opinion, both type of friends bring advantages and disadvantages so that selecting a friend is individuals choice but they should not be argued on each and every topic which can lead to break up friendship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t that choosing a friend and maintaining a friendship is indispensable to stay me...
^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... indispensable to stay mentally healthy thats why some echelons of society admit that...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end should be chosen of those people who have similar views, however. others con...
^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of those people who have similar views, however. others consider that a friend s...
^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Others
...ople who have similar views, however. others consider that a friend should have diff...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w. Having same thinking on matters is bring least chances of conflicts, it wou...
^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
... Having same thinking on matters is bring least chances of conflicts, it would br...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'bring the least'.
Suggestion: bring the least
... Having same thinking on matters is bring least chances of conflicts, it would bring fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...d bring friendship long lasting. If two person have similarities they can choose same ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iends have keen interest in table tennis , they will spend huge quality of time to...
^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd huge quality of time together without any disruption as a result, bonding auto...
^^
Line 6, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these qualities are required in renowned companies for doing job. To encaps...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2030651341 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87697153476 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63601532567 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.9478277793 49.4020404114 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286802949437 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108924806882 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055973971366 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147256862318 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621076652045 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.