Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that many people prefer watching TV shows and movies from overseas. While many people say that such imported products have brought the diversity to local culture, I would argue that it is necessary to promote local entertainment products.
On the one hand, some people believe that the popularity of foreign shows have brought some benefits for host country's culture. Firstly, watching foreign channels may enable local residents to understand more about other countries' customs and tradition as well as expand their horizon. The clearest example is that if people didn't watch discovery channels, they could only know natural wonders of the world through travelling which is usually very costly or even unaffordable for many people. Secondly, the exposure to foreign media might have huge impacts on habits and local lifestyle. There is no doubt that nowadays many Asian families have adapted to new western cultures like celebrating Christmas and welcoming new year even though such festivals are only for Western countries in the past.
On the other hand, I would argue that the efforts to produce local films or musical products can be more beneficial for local community. First of all, the focus on producing national programs may not only help to boost the entertainment industry but also enhance the image of that country. For example, the unprecedented development of Korean movies and pop music has not only brought a huge profit for their country but also broadcasted their local lifestyles such as fashion trends and cuisines to other countries in the world. Second of all, traditional movies might help young viewers know more about the regional landscapes of their countries and gain their knowledge about their own tradition and customs. As the result, such cultural understanding can help youngsters become the representatives of their country to introduce their valuable culture to the world.
In conclusion, although the attraction from foreign films and TV shows are undeniable, I would argue that making local products should be more encouraged.
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...promote local entertainment products. On the one hand, some people believe tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... The clearest example is that if people didnt watch discovery channels, they could on...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly for Western countries in the past. On the other hand, I would argue that th...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their valuable culture to the world. In conclusion, although the attraction f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3081570997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65068855509 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543806646526 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0876360305 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.153846154 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17143468024 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067363341749 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038001123179 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099124421801 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347744380181 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.