Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking
It is undeniable that nowadays people have chosen different kinds of transportation for commuting rather than walking. The reasons behind the lack of waking in daily life along with some possible solutions to combat the situation will be discussed in the following.
This alarming phenomenon is being caused by multiple reasons. The most essential reason is there are many alternative ways to commute for residents to choose. For example, driving cars or taking public transportation are likely to be faster than walking to offices. As the result, modern employees have tended to choose those transportation's options to save their commuting time. Another prominent cause is people nowadays get used to sedentary lifestyle due to daily use of high tech products. For example, if households in developed countries didn’t buy electrical appliances such as vacuum robots and dishwashers to replace manual works, family members could spend more time for housework. It seems to be an explanation for the dependence of human on machines in transportation.
On the other hand, however, I maintain that there are numerous of solutions to solve this issue. The most prominent solution is that governments can apply some policies to encourage residents to regain their walking habits. For example, if governments raised taxes on private car ownership, car owners could think about physical walking to their offices. In addition, authorities could also give some generous subsidies for those who walked to offices. Another significant solution is that city planners and authorities can build more public areas with sidewalks, and they also can organize more walking campaigns like some local fundraising walks. An obvious result is residents will raise awareness about the benefits of walking and they might bring back their walking habit.
In conclusion, although there are fewer chances for people to walk nowadays, I'm of the opinion that people will start walking with some right approaches from governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-26 | thaskeen123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Prachi Agrawal | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Prachi Agrawal | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | ike | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | MinhVo | 84 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...holds in developed countries didn't buy electrical appliances such as vacuum...
^^
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ework. It seems to be an explanation for the dependence of human on machines in t...
^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of human on machines in transportation. On the other hand, however, I maintain t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...er chances for people to walk nowadays, Im of the opinion that people will start w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82152516797 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0885764084 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239897091743 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696939516095 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611649201898 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145404590703 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645957885811 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.