Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking?
It is undeniable that nowadays people have chosen different kinds of transportation for commuting rather than walking. The reason behind the lack of this basic physical activity along with some possible solutions to combat the situation will be discussed in the following
The alarming phenomenon is being caused by multiple reasons. The most essential reason is there are many alternative ways to commute for residents to choose. For example, driving cars or taking public transportation are likely to be faster than walking to offices. As a result, modern employees have tended to choose those transportation's options to save their commuting time. Another prominent cause is city dwellers nowadays get used to the sedentary lifestyle due to the daily use of high-tech products, so walking is no longer in the public's favor as the efficient way to stay in shape. For example, if households in developed countries did not buy electrical appliances such as vacuum robots and dishwashers to replace manual works, family members could spend more time for housework. It seems to be an explanation for the dependence of human on machines in transportation.
On the other hand, I maintain that there are numerous solutions to solve this issue. The most prominent solution is that governments can apply some policies to encourage residents to regain their walking habits. For example, if government raise taxes on car ownership, car owners could think about physical walking to their offices. Another significant solution is that city planners and authorities can build more public areas with sidewalks or organize walking campaigns such as local fundraising walks. An obvious result is residents will raise awareness about the benefits of walking and they might bring back their walking habit.
In conclusion, although there are fewer chances for people to walk nowadays, I'm of the opinion that people will start walking with some right approaches from governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | Prachi Agrawal | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Prachi Agrawal | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | ike | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | MinhVo | 89 | view |
| 2017-01-28 | Omkarphansalkar | 84 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What is the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on is being caused by multiple reasons. The most essential reason is there are many...
^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...er chances for people to walk nowadays, Im of the opinion that people will start w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35806451613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82308935508 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609677419355 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2202280798 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253467370858 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756518999108 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623837304602 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148704390113 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653440124241 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.