Few people have contentious thought whether sports executed as a party have more positive outcome than the ones that requires solitary player.In this essay I will discuss both standpoints and showcase my perception why teams sports are more preferable because of the benefits it offers.
People who believed that playing as a part of a team yields positive results tends to have the following logic. Firstly, playing as a team will improve ones cooperation and coordination skills. Motivated by the same goal, the individual tends to have trust on each others teammates knowing that there is someone that will back you up in any worst case scenario. Secondly, a cryptonite of an individual can be the forte of someone, that is why in a team there is an allocated person for every crucial role, thus team play will be fully maximize since all team members are giving all of their matered talents.
However, people who lean into the thought that sports played as a single entity will be more valuable also have their arguments. To start with, playing a single sport will gradually boost their self confidence, this is due to the fact that they are only relying on their own physical and mental strength. For example, in a chess game, a player would solely focus and give hes very best in order to eradicate the oppositions side.
To infer, variety of sports has its own pros and cons. In spite of that, I believed that playing as a party outwit the merits of a individual sports with its team coordination, cooperation and solidified player roles which makes it more fun and exciting.
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales and their products. What are those methods? Which is the most effective method? 84
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. what are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree? 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... the ones that requires solitary player.In this essay I will discuss both standpoi...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...Firstly, playing as a team will improve ones cooperation and coordination skills. Mo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...e, a player would solely focus and give hes very best in order to eradicate the opp...
^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...playing as a party outwit the merits of a individual sports with its team coordin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in spite of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8315018315 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53306171839 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5594632418 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214559033717 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896574559168 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515634713615 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133890935341 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205804555914 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.