Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

Few people have contentious thought on whether state-of-the-art technology affecting people to be more or less sociable. In this essay I will discuss both standpoint, followed by my own point of view.

People who believes that people who extends there social life trough the use of high tech innovations tend to have the following logic. First of all, internet base inventions such as Facebook, Instagram and other social media gives the user the ability to communicate with other people in real time across the globe. To sight a significant example, before parents who work abroad experienced homesickness because of the stress and loneliness they felt when they are afar. But in todays world, they can easily communicate with their loveones trough facebook chat, share and create happy moments using video call, to eradicate the pain. Secondly, Telegrams and snail mail are now becoming obsolete, many people are now into text messaging or voice call using there mobile phone while they are offline.

On the other hand, people who claim that high technology makes a certain number of people to be less sociable also have their arguments. Firstly, people who was greatly submerge using cutting-edge technology tends to interact with their friends and relatives remotely, this elevates serious problem with their relationship to others. For example, their are certain important events that a persons presence is needed such as birthday, visiting sick or dead people , or even a family gathering. Sadly, instead of participating physically, people sometimes just buy cards or even purchasing gifts from ecommerce websites and directly delivered it to the event. Moreover, research shows that young individual prefer virtual social gatherings using internet base games, rather than going outside and interact with real people.

As per my perspective, modern technology offers a lot of benefits for us individuals to expand our circle of friends and kin, But, undoubtedly too much use of it will cripple a persons way on connecting with other people.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmunicate with other people in real time across the globe. To sight a significant...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'submerged'.
Suggestion: submerged
...uments. Firstly, people who was greatly submerge using cutting-edge technology tends to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ir relationship to others. For example, their are certain important events that a per...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...eir are certain important events that a persons presence is needed such as birthday, vi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s birthday, visiting sick or dead people , or even a family gathering. Sadly, inst...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, first of all, more or less, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70122810855 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643076923077 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6670084151 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226176858049 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793783803449 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768838539118 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139993923796 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789001614207 0.056905535591 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.