A job is an important part of life. Longer periods of waking hours of our life are spent doing a job. It is a necessary requirement for most of us to pay our bills. A person with higher income can have an extravagance lifestyle for himself and his family members as well. Therefore, it has been argued that, salary income is the only factor to be considered in selecting a carrier. However, in my opinion job satisfaction not solely depend on money, and there are several other equally important things to look for.
In further illustration, higher paying jobs have a higher demand for working hours. Companies and management always try to squeeze out the maximum from the employer. As a result, worker may have to work beyond their standard working hours. They find adequate time to enjoy neither himself nor with his family. For instance, house maids from low income countries are coming to work in Middle East countries for two to three years and not only scolded, but beaten as well to force for more work. Some of them have suicide due to harassment by horrible bosses.
On the other hand, distance from house to work place is an important aspect to consider. Shorter distances can ensure more leisure time for worker, as it can reduce undue traveling time. Greater distances invariably cost substantial travel fair, which can lower the salary balance. Here, in Sri Lanka lot of school teachers try to get their job appointments as close as to their home towns to attend more to their families and do better savings to assign more money for their children’s higher education. Furthermore, every one of us is happy to do the occupation in relation to what we have learnt during school or college education. This will probably help to develop the carrier with more confidence, in addition to get promotions and salary increments with more experience, despite a minor position in a company.
In conclusion, treasure alone from a job is not the true pleasure for life. If, one does not select the path appropriately, it can lead to interruption of carrier and loss of more money than we could have earned. Wise selection is not hard, when we have an overall vision.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family.Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job?What other factors should be considered? 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages? 89
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80053191489 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63510955042 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587765957447 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7568613321 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9523809524 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207595081698 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602201939691 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501681135919 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125974628484 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575074413988 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.