Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one

Essay topics:

Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?

The mobile phone has been an important thing in the life of people, irrespective of their age. Many students around the world have mobile phones. Undeniably, it plays a major role when we talk about safety, connectedness, or even learning. Despite this, a lot of schools have restricted the usage of mobile phones on campus. In my view, I think this is a positive step and have a lot of benefits not just academically but physically and socially too.
Restricting the usage of phones in the classroom can itself improve learning. By refraining, students from using mobile phones in the classroom will allow them to give undivided attention to the teacher and improve their concentration. For an instance, if a student is in the class and suddenly his phone beeps with a social media notification, he will have an irresistible urge to pick up his phone and check it out. Meanwhile, he will miss what their teacher was explaining and this will break continuity and he might miss out on something important while he was busy scrolling through some irrelevant material. This disturbance won’t just be limited to him but other students sitting around him and the teacher will also be bothered. Thus, to avoid such unnecessary distractions it is advised to ban phone usage inside the classrooms.
Apart from this, usage of mobile phones in canteens or playgrounds is also something which hinders the physical and social development of the student. Instead of spending lunchtime socializing with their classmates, students are usually seen hung on their phones. Similarly, while playing sports when their 100% attention should be on their game, they get distracted with the beep of the notification. This could have some serious long-term repercussions on kids and so it would be beneficial to restrict mobile phones on the campus.
To summarize this, I would say that the adverse effects of using phones in the school are way higher and I strongly support restricting the usage of phones in the school.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-01-15 Haseya 92 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting the usage of phones in the school.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, thus, while, apart from, i think, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01801801802 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83372439696 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546546546547 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9350420573 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340640025856 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119565475976 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107668923546 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23365950611 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613194243385 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.