Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Salary is the main motivation behind working in a nine to five corporate job setup for most of the employees working in metro cities. To be able to pay their bills and loans is the main impetus for employees to continuing their jobs. I disagree with the view that based upon the ability to produce and sell a product should form a basis for deciding the salary of any worker.
Beyond any qualms there are a myriad of logical reasons to prove that productivity of any employee cannot be decided solely on the basis of ability to create and trade a product. I believe that a person working in the back office whose job is to make sure that the internet and server problems are not faced by any employee in the office are also contributing for the overall goal of the company. For example, in a sales office IT office workers who are given the job to make sure that the resources do not waste their time to look for server issues and other IT related problems are making an equally important impact for the success of the company overall. Therefore, it is unfair to think that workers on the front-line are solely running the company and to give whole credibility and salary to them. If the above argument had been true that back end employees will get no salary at all.
On the contrary, some people believe that giving salary on the basis of individual’s ability to sell and produce defines their overall monetary contribution for their organization and thus it is them who should receive the bonus. Moreover, they also believe that it will motivate other employees to compete with their colleges and hence increase their motivation to work hard. Furthermore, those workers who take advantage of the current corporate setup will no longer benefit when the salary will be based on the amount of monetary gains the employees bring for the institution.
In conclusion, I believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of this system. It is totally unfair to form production and sales as the criteria for getting salary. Most of the businesses will collapse if this system would be introduced as the back end employees will lose their enthusiasm and zest for the job. Will the current company structure understand these motives? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 81
- Some people believe that countries should produce the food to feed their population themselves and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- When we can see films on phones that what the need of going to the cinemas is Others say that to fully enjoy the films it should be seen in cinemas Give both views and give your opinion 56
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport constuction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destination 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'setup' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'setups'.
Suggestion: setups
...working in a nine to five corporate job setup for most of the employees working in me...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...worker. Beyond any qualms there are a myriad of logical reasons to prove that produc...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 805, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e whole credibility and salary to them. If the above argument had been true that b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77806122449 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54749629029 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4098461893 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123451084979 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440970822903 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466725102788 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853796070879 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487582482412 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.