In this day and age, in spite of new technologies such as Internet and television, many people believe that traditional education is by far more beneficial in acquiring knowledge for students. I completely disagree with this opinion, and in this essay I will state the reason for my view.
The most compelling reason for holding to my view is that Internet and television itself holds various kind of information that students or even teachers can use for their learning. For example, with just a few words search on the internet, it would yield loads of data about that topic, some could be in forms of article, pictures of even videos.
Another reason for my position is that teachers might not be that updated and knowledgeable about specific lessons that they want to inculcate to their students. For instance, teacher might be too old to know recent advancements or breakthrough in one subject matter perhaps.
A final reason in support of my view is that possibly not all students can afford to study in traditional schools hence their only option is to study on their own. The reason for this is that schools are too expensive nowadays with books and miscellaneous fees to consider, especially big universities. This result for students to consider other means of educating themselves.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with the opinion that students learn more from teachers as opposed to other modes of learning. Given this situation, it is recommended that students should consider utilizing new technologies to broaden their knowledge.
- Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes an 67
- Overpopulation Problems and Solutions 56
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- Positive and negative view of nuclear power
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83205140957 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1910957934 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.090909091 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268149575653 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107602118455 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772693641639 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154011251965 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843394770515 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.