Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether taking lessons with academics to be more beneficial in comparison with learning through television or the internet is a moot question. However, education in learning environment seems to have always an overwhelming superiority over learning from other sources despite the many benefits of which. I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, students give primacy to studying under the supervision of their pedagogues because assimilating teacher-led lessons is far more. This is because teachers often are well-educated not only in their field of study but in teaching procedures as well. Therefore, they know how to teach more effectively and can simply convey to the students what exactly they are required to learn. Furthermore, learners have the opportunity to take in lessons via interactive methods meaning that they can question when having problems with the lessons. Likewise, the continuous assessment by the teachers helps students make steady progress in their learning process. Further and even more importantly, though, students will be able to select courses based on their interest fields. Examples can be seen particularly at universities where a bewildering array of options ranging from theoretical courses to practical ones provided by well-rounded pedagogical experts are available to be delivered.
It is true that the effectiveness of other sources such as television and the internet should not be ignored as they can be instantly accessible everywhere. Nevertheless, their functionality pales compared to the human-teaching method by which students could master far more efficiently.
Overall, to discriminate between learning sources, although television and the internet could play a complementary role in learning, it would appear that guided learning is easily the most functional and efficient procedure, by a significant margin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 84 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- Nowadays people are affected by social media and the Internet Is it a good or a bad trend in your opinion Explain it by giving your own examples 79
- Students in school and university learn far more by lessons with their teachers compared to other sources such as television and internet. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- You have recently ordered an item from the Internet, but are not happy with the purchase. Write to the company. In your letterDescribe what you purchasedExplain why you are not happy with the purchaseTell them what you would like them to do about the situ 87
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letterSay where / when you went on holidayExplain why you are not satisfied with your holidayTell them what you would like them to do 87
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all lessons while others think they should focus on subjects in which they are stronger and they find interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73476702509 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15033578567 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2878275118 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348096320284 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109104965164 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615066551459 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19239785985 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407173982852 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.