Nowadays, people living in large cities face many problems in their daily lives. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage people to move to smaller towns?
In the years afterwards industrial revolution, a burgeoning number of individuals migrated to cities in search of the higher standard of living, and more job opportunities. This trend has continued since then; however, it has been neither total boon nor bane to city dwellers since they are obliged to cope with various potentially formidable obstacles. This issue has raised doubt as to whether authorities should convince people to settle in smaller towns rather than megacities. This essay will try to identify predicaments correlated with living in urban areas, and, therefore, propose some alternative practical solutions.
On the face of this issue, one might cite that living in cities would offer salvation to their habitats; albeit, dwelling in cities tend to be superficially attractive as there are a wide range pressing problems posed in the path of city residents. First striking problem interwoven with this sort of lifestyle would be environmental contamination. Probably the most haunting form of contamination in cities is air pollution. Due to the ongoing increase in the number of private cars, commuting in cities and burning fossil fuels, air pollution has reached a perturbing level in many metropolitan cities. Having attracted millions of job seekers given the number of industries running there, Shanghai is probably placed on the top of polluted cities across the world. Shanghai municipal administrations are scratching their heads to find a solution so as to tackle air pollution. Exhausting traffic congestion is equally worrying. Meaning that people are squandering their time on streets full of vehicles, making bumper-to-bumper traffic, which drastically wastes habitants’ time. Moreover, traffic stream can generate tension, leaving the detrimental impression on people’s lives.
Although city lifestyle has its own serious problems, the whole idea of living in cities is not that doom and gloom. Many individuals are of the view that governments should do their utmost to re-settle public in small towns in a bid to curb above-mentioned issues. However, this idea appears to be outlandish considering the fact that there are a number of viable steps can be taken to ameliorate the current situation. One concerted step could be initiating a fresh legislation, imposing heavy taxes on residents who are willing to use their private cars instead of public transportation. The raised capital of this scheme can be channelled toward investments in substituting renewable energy sources for contaminating fossil fuels. No sooner do government enforces suggested laws, than both pollution and traffic congestion will be eliminated.
According to above analysis, we can arrive at a concluding view admitting the fact that city dweller is confronting several frustrating obstacles; however, this view simultaneously rejects the evacuation plan given more sensible recommended measures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... obstacles. This issue has raised doubt as to whether authorities should convince people to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n smaller towns rather than megacities. This essay will try to identify predicaments...
^^^^
Line 3, column 850, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ratching their heads to find a solution so as to tackle air pollution. Exhausting traffi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 31.9359605911 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 1207.87684729 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 443.0 242.827586207 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62076749436 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 3.92707691288 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14625722357 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 139.433497537 197% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618510158014 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 379.143842365 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3295716927 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196994781179 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521567153163 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486209123651 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979585146784 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551733816778 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 55.0591133005 272% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.