Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Teachers could by far be more lucrative for pupils to learn from in comparison with other educational sources comprising internet, TV and etc. While it may not seem fair to some, it has irrefutably been defended by the majority of people. Although there are some shortcomings in schools’ pedagogy methods, I believe the merits often outweigh the drawbacks.
It goes without saying that, teachers are straightforward in touch with children’s emotions and their learning capabilities. They can realize when students are beaten, out of steam and in need of some breaks so asto retain energy for the rest of the school time. Or contrastively when they are totally charged and dynamic so to be taught different subjects. Additionally, through comprehending students’ strengths and weaknesses, their trainers know which points to be elaborated more or less. Moreover, it is comprehensively rational to claim that teachers are the main triggers for children to improve their academic life. Teachers can pursue pupils’ advancements and meanwhile consult them with some productive precautions to follow and fulfil their to-be expectations namely, hunting a fruitful occupation later, opting a university major by widely opened- eyes and not stepping in an unacceptable way. Further virtues would include that teachers are obliged to give genuine and authentic answers to the instant questions popping up in students minds.
Having said that, other educational references are primarily some pre-recorded videos concentrating on a specific school subject for which students' learning abilities stand in the least priority. In fact, children’s questions cannot be satisfactorily answered due to the fact that a restricted amount of time has been allocated to such means. Besides, there is no mutual communication between the pupils and teachers and all the questioned areas can’t be addressed. Children, for instance, struggling with some areas of math problems are in severe need of being in a direct relationship with their instructors or tutors so to resolve their problematic issues. If not, such wrong knowledge will be remained in their mind and cause inevitable dilemmas in their higher--educating period. Ultimately, spending time at school with real and not virtual teachers are too useful to be ignored.
While it may be true to say that other educational tools apart from teachers could perhaps be practical in students’ learning of school subjects, they must never be substituted by the existence of the in-person interaction between pupils and their instructors. Therefore, this opinion is better to be abandoned which declares social media or social networking are of great importance in students’ didactic life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 84 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations, while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give the advantages of both and express your own point of view. 73
- Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe that it is more important to teIch children the literature of their own country than of other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 61
- Music should not be taught in schools. Instead, other subjects such as compurers and science should be taught. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Teachers could by far be more lucrative ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ational sources comprising internet, TV and etc. While it may not seem fair to some, it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merits often outweigh the drawbacks. It goes without saying that, teachers ar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 904, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unacceptable way" with adverb for "unacceptable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...by widely opened- eyes and not stepping in an unacceptable way. Further virtues would include that tea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stions popping up in students minds. Having said that, other educational refe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achers are too useful to be ignored. While it may be true to say that other e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, in fact, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20711634309 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3097889729 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.277777778 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237689847431 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766057998157 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590145164064 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15754466337 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218032721247 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.