Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether taking lessons with academics to be more beneficial in comparison with learning through television or the internet is a moot question. However, I believe that education in the learning environment always has an overwhelming superiority over learning from other sources despite the many benefits of which. This essay will explain why.
Firstly, students usually place a premium on studying under the supervision of pedagogical experts. If they prefer to take teacher-led lessons, it is because teachers often are well-educated not only in teaching procedures but in a particular field of study as well. This will give students the ideal opportunity to take in all lessons from the right sources. Therefore, they can greatly benefit from the interaction with their pedagogue and their peers in an academic environment meaning that they will be able to question whenever having a problem with the lessons or whatever vague. Likewise, the continuous assessment provided by teachers which in turn help them make steady progress in the learning process. Further and even more importantly, though, students will be able to select courses based on their interest fields. This can be seen, for example, at universities where a bewildering array of options ranging from theoretical courses to practical ones as well as well-rounded professors are available.
It is true that the importance of other sources such as television and the internet should not be ignored as they can be instantly accessible everywhere. Nevertheless, their functionality pales compared to the human-teaching method by which students could master far more.
Overall, to discriminate between learning sources, although television and the internet could play a complementary role in learning, it seems to me that guided learning is easily the most functional and efficient procedure, by a significant margin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 69 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 80
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources such as television or the internet Do you agree or disagree 69
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping? Explain your reasons 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52068965517 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06159712115 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61724137931 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6438378115 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330139802875 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101036166414 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595884805974 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18782947171 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388778079597 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.