To succeed in a business, one needs to know maths.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Possessing math skills to run a business successfully has always been a question of debate. It has its supporters and protesters. But, I think that having adequate knowledge of the product, strategy and proper planning is sufficient to manage any kind of organization.
The supporters of this argument come forward with few reasons. First, they express that having maths knowledge will enhance their business opportunities as it will be helpful while conducting an accurate analysis of the market. Second, many scholars emphasize the success rate of their students who achieved great milestones after acquiring higher degrees from prestigious universities such as Oxford, Stanford, and Howard. Finally, they convey that this will further useful in preparing stock market purchases, account balance details, and video game designs.
Critics argue that learning maths is not a primary requisite for maintaining any business. Tactics and management skills are required to run any type of industry. For instance, many famous industrialists or tycoons are such as Bull Gates, Steve Jobs, Ratan Tata, and Anil Ambani are not experts in this subject. Moreover, they recruit professionals with mathematics skillset to maintain their work and empire. However, there are advancements in technology that can be utilized to do all math work instead of learning it such as tax apps, excel, AI.
All in all, if we look deep, passion, keen observation, dedication, presence of mind and above all motivational skills to drive their employees towards the goals are wanted potentials for any leader. Inconclusion, I strongly believe that having math expertise will not run a successful business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Others believe that it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone Do you agree or disagree with the statement 67
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, i think, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51153846154 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9102832372 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669230769231 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0662255958 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0698948766148 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243746907093 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347857646194 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424569614647 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144927237288 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.