Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of more money than people in other important professions.
Sports professional get fame and money based on their performance in their game and fan following they have. Whether this pay is more than the amounts received by people from important professionals? This essay deliberates this conundrum in detail.
Sportsman, in general, is considered to represent their nation on an international platform, while playing their game. They shoulder immense responsibility for getting success, not only for their team but for their home country. They dedicate several hours practising their sports, where they devote a lot of their personal time and money and sacrifice their family life. For example, PT Usha, an Indian athlete, who won for India 4 gold medal and 1 silver medals in the tracks and fields events. To do this feat, she would have spent several hours on a running track. Further, a sportsman inspires the youth of the nation to stay fit and healthy. Managing a healthy diet and lifestyle requires investment in expensive superfoods and access to world-class trainers and training facilities. Some sportsman requires to travel abroad to get specialised training if adequate or advanced level coaching is not available in their countries. For example, Grandmaster Vishwanathan Anand, Indian chess player and World’s No.1 (in 2007) trained in Norway with his peers.
However, it would be unfair only for sports-heroes to receive hefty sums for their achievements in the game. Other people who pioneer in their professions do also deserve to pay for extremely vital skills. For example, a Cardiac specialist is highly paid and skilled doctors, who not only save the patient’s life from critical illness but also, cater to their physical well-being. Another example of enormously talented people are Actors, who deserve to be remunerated for their rare skill-sets. Apart from acting performances and entertainment they give, their life is constantly under the scanner and people wish to be privy to their favourite star’s life. Another set of people who should receive, undoubtedly, higher remuneration are army men. They sacrifice their lives for their countrymen and live in harsh conditions protecting the border of their nations.
Hence, based on aforesaid discussion, sportsman does deserve to be paid higher remuneration to upkeep their motivations, health needs and continuously foster their expertise. At the same time, professionals who are vital for societal needs should receive a good amount of earnings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-26 | Rakap | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Rashid JB | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | Mahsa k | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | harisvohra | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | vikrant25us | 61 | view |
- plastic shopping bags contribute the pollution of land and sea, some thinkthey should be banned.Do you agree and disagree. 84
- Are zoos cruel to wild animals? Discuss 84
- It is seen that small shops and local markets are losing their influence because of supermarkets and malls. 78
- You recently did a short cookery course. The cookery school asked for your feedback on this course. Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school. In your letter. describe what you enjoyed about the course.. say how much cooking you've done 78
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 815, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...ing facilities. Some sportsman requires to travel abroad to get specialised training if a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46113989637 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92238084564 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598445595855 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7013560087 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834562723985 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323492878062 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576934947369 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751974021883 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776934913588 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.