Television has improved the quality of life for the the ordinary person. Do you agree or diagree?
The quality of life can be advanced thanks to various digital devices which have been invented over time. It appears that television is one of the most effective gadgets which has the key role in this way.
Firstly, people particularly who have enough time to spend at following social media such as television can gain a variety of useful knowledge just via watching TV. For instance, individuals who have no awareness of health and the benefits of working out, now realize that playing sports can be really beneficial for their bodies. This is because the varied programs about the role of sports in keeping health are playing around the clock. The more educational programs people watch, the more the quality of their lives can be improved. In addition, a second and perhaps most significant impact of watching TV on ordinary people's lives is that individuals can recognize that in other countries what types of activities have been doing in order to have the high quality of life. They understand what they have to demand their governments to be changed the level of their lives into the best, indeed. If people try to learn the practical approaches via watching TV, for example, reality shows, they will make positive changes in their lives.
It is true that some TV shows might be useless apparently so that some believe that watching them is a waste of time. Despite this, it seems that TV is a multiple purpose device meaning that individuals can determine what they intend to obtain from what they are observing. That is why people are entitled to choose what they like to watch in accordance with not only their needs but also their interests.
To conclude, it seems to me that television can improve the quality of human's life. However, there might be some programs which are not beneficial apparently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88709677419 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48300990521 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4118808743 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12403745098 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497091650601 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682233092328 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927514154244 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061790414453 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.